October 24, 2009 | permalink
A few years ago, inquiring journalists began writing about the deception behind Baby Einstein videos, which promised to make toddlers smarter. Not only were the videos of no educational value, they could be harmful; the American Academy of Pediatrics advises that children under the age of two should not watch videos. My wife, Alissa Quart, was one of the skeptics. She wrote about the problem in her 2006 book, Hothouse Kids, and her chapter on the Baby Einstein phenomenon was excerpted in The Atlantic. Disney, which owns the Baby Einstein brand, has finally admitted to the deception, offering refunds to all purchasers of the videos. This comes after public-interest lawyers warned the company of a possible class-action lawsuit. The story in today’s New York Times summed up the situation:
Last year, lawyers threatened a class-action lawsuit for unfair and deceptive practices unless Disney agreed to refund the full purchase price to all who bought the videos since 2004. “The Walt Disney Company’s entire Baby Einstein marketing regime is based on express and implied claims that their videos are educational and beneficial for early childhood development,” a letter from the lawyers said, calling those claims “false because research shows that television viewing is potentially harmful for very young children.” The letter cited estimates from The Washington Post and Business Week that Baby Einstein controlled 90 percent of the baby media market, and sold $200 million worth of products annually. The letter also described studies showing that television exposure at ages 1 through 3 is associated with attention problems at age 7.
It’s a children’s story with a happy ending.
A look at oil’s indelible impact on the countries that produce it and the people who possess it.
Dispatches from the war in Bosnia, published in 1996 by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
Polk/NYT Conference on Surveillance
New York, NY | March 21, 2014
New York, NY | April 23, 2014